Former PUCO Chair Sam Randazzo shaped agency responses to HB 6 scandal: โProactiveโ show-cause action followed only after bad publicity. Randazzo and others closely tracked legislative actions as well.
This article is provided by Eye on Ohio, the nonprofit, nonpartisan Ohio Center for Journalism in partnership with the nonprofit Energy News Network. Please join the free mailing lists for Eye on Ohio or the Energy News Network, as this helps provide more public service reporting.
Newly produced documents show that Sam Randazzo, former chair of the Public Utilities Commission of Ohio, came up with the idea to let FirstEnergy show it didnโt use ratepayer money for House Bill 6, the nuclear and coal bailout law at the heart of Ohioโs largest corruption case.
The move was far short of a full investigation that consumer advocates have called for. And itโs unclear whether the Public Utilities Commission of Ohio would have done anything at that point in September 2020 without bad publicity.
FirstEnergy was identified as โCompany Aโ in the federal governmentโs complaint against former Ohio House Speaker Larry Householder and others in July 2020. The complaint detailed how the company, its affiliates and others had funneled roughly $60 million to dark money groups to elect lawmakers friendly to Householder, pass the stateโs nuclear and coal bailout law, and prevent a voter referendum on the law.
FirstEnergy later disclosed that it had paid $4 million to a company linked to Randazzo shortly before he became PUCO chair. The company admitted last summer that it made the payment with the expectation that Randazzo would act in FirstEnergyโs interests with respect to HB 6 and other legislative and regulatory priorities. Randazzo is now a defendant in the state of Ohioโs civil conspiracy case arising out of HB 6.
Seven weeks after the federal governmentโs complaint became public, the PUCO still hadnโt taken any action. The Office of the Ohio Consumersโ Counsel asked the agency to order an independent investigation and management audit of FirstEnergyโs utilities, corporate governance and activities relating to HB 6. The Consumersโ Counsel also asked for an independent audit on an unlawful rider under which FirstEnergyโs utilities had collected more than $450 million.
Randazzo sent a heads up about the consumersโ counselโs move to Gov. Mike DeWineโs former chief of staff, Laurel Dawson, whose former firm and whose husband had done lobbying work for FirstEnergy.
โThanks, Sam. Will be back in touch,โ Dawson replied on Sept. 9, 2020.
Even then, the PUCO didnโt do anything until Matt Schilling, PUCOโs public affairs director, sent several news clips to Randazzo and others on Sept. 15, 2020. โPUCO needs to โconnect the dots,โโ said one editorial headline from the Sandusky Register.
โSo, we need to do something to respond to OCCโs request for an investigation,โ Randazzo said in a group email that afternoon. โIt was/is my understanding that we were going to put out an AE [Attorney Examiner] entry requesting comments on OPCC [the Consumersโ Counselโs] request.โ
โJust thinking out loudโฆsince this issue has grabbed media attention would it be better to have commissioners issue something asking for comments at our next meeting instead of an AE?โ asked Commissioner Beth Trombold in response. โJust wondering if it would signal better that we are engaged.โ
โI donโt care which path we take โฆ I have a slight preference for doing something sooner,โ Randazzo responded. He went on to say that the PUCO already audited FirstEnergyโs riders. โMy point here is that we need to be proactiveโฆโ PUCO Deputy Director Katherine Fleck then offered to put something together for commissioners and others, including Schilling, to review.
โWe could, on our own initiative, issue a show cause order to FE [FirstEnergy] directing FE to demonstrate that no costs associated with HB 6 have been included in any riders or base rates,โ Randazzo wrote.
Senior utilities attorney examiner Gregory Price issued that order that afternoon. Heโs also an attorney examiner in some of the PUCOโs other limited-issue FirstEnergy cases relating to HB 6.
The PUCOโs โbaby stepโ response of letting FirstEnergy report on itself received criticism from several fronts. Lawmakers also asked questions when Randazzo testified before a House select committee on Sept. 16, 2020.
โItโs a case. Itโs an investigation. What happens after that, as I hope you would expect of us, would be a function of what the evidence shows and what our legal authority is. And thatโs as much as I can say about this,โ Randazzo said in answer to questions from Rep. David Leland, a Democrat from Columbus.
After FirstEnergy fired former CEO Charles Jones and other executives, the PUCO announced a corporate separation audit of FirstEnergy. But, Randazzo told Schilling on Nov. 5, โCorporate separation requirements โฆ are not designed to address politics or lobbying (coordinated or otherwise) except as cost allocation may be involved.โ PUCO staff later told bidders for that audit not to include any HB 6-related activities in their work.
On Nov. 16, 2020, FBI agents searched Randazzoโs home. FirstEnergy disclosed later that week that it had paid $4 million to a company linked to Randazzo shortly before he became PUCO chair. Randazzo resigned on Nov. 20, 2020.
Behind the scenes
Legislative records released in December 2020 show that Randazzo played a significant behind-the-scenes role on House Bill 6 before it was passed.
And newly produced documents from the PUCO show Randazzo continued to play a significant role after the HB 6 scandal became public.
Among other things, Randazzo and others at the PUCO reviewed bills that called for a full repeal of HB 6 and provided an โinternal document on the repeal legislationโ to advisors in DeWineโs office.
That document may have been a version of a spreadsheet of โRepeal HB 6 scenarios.โ The document outlined options such as repealing the nuclear subsidies, repealing those subsidies plus the coal plant bailout, and repealing those provisions as well as recession-proofing provisions for utilities. The spreadsheet also listed an option for no repeal, but with a fortified audit of the billโs nuclear subsidies and tweaking of the subsidiesโ timing.
None of the options included a full repeal of HB 6 or a repeal that would have undone its gut of Ohioโs clean energy standards.
Price, a hearing examiner in the PUCOโs ongoing FirstEnergy cases, was included on some of the emails about proposed repeal legislation in the summer of 2020.
Additionally, a September 2020 comparison of select HB 6 nuclear provisions with a 2019 compromise bill was addressed to Randazzo and Price,
โper your request.โ (The other bill would also have kept Ohioโs clean energy standards and reform wind turbine setbacks that lawmakers tripled in 2014.)
Randazzo also sought comments and suggestions from Price and others on draft testimony for the Ohio Senate, including โunwinding challengesโ of HB 6. And Randazzo also sought input after former PUCO Commissioner Ashley Brown wrote in a Sept. 4, 2020 editorial that the PUCO had previously called on Columbia Gas to replace its board of directors.
In addition, Price apparently attended some discussions on the bill before its enactment in 2019. Itโs unclear why Price, a senior utilities attorney examiner, would have been included in those pre- and post-enactment communications.
โWhy he would be weighing in on what should or shouldnโt be in legislation seems like a bit of a mystery,โ said Dave Anderson, policy and communications manager for the Energy and Policy Institute.
Price has made several rulings in the 17 months since September 2020, which has frustrated the Office of the Ohio Consumersโ Counselโs efforts to get full information from FirstEnergy in its HB 6 cases.
Ohio lawmakers didnโt repeal HB 6โs $1.1 billion in subsidies for FirstEnergy Solutionsโ former nuclear plants (now owned by Energy Harbor) until late March 2021. Several other parts of HB 6 remain on the books, including its gut of the stateโs clean energy standards and subsidies for two 1950s-era coal plants. Consumers have paid roughly $225 million for those subsidies since January 2020.
The 13 gigabytes of materials produced by the PUCO on Feb. 11 represent only part of the records turned over to the federal government in response to subpoenas released last year. The agencyโs legal review of materials is ongoing and it plans to supplement its response to public records requests, said PUCO Deputy Legal Director Donald Leming.
One response to “Former Ohio regulator linked to $4 million payoff directed agency to limit response to FirstEnergy corruption”
Awesome reporting on the biggest consumer rip-off in Ohio history.